Installer Attitude Studies
What's Wrong With This Picture?
by Ed Newman
AMSOIL Marketing & Advertising Manager
This article appeared in the
December 2003 Issue of National Oil & Lube News
In the October 2003 edition of
Aftermarket Business there is an intriguing feature story about
the attitudes of mechanics regarding the installation of various
auto parts. The survey was conducted online, with invitations
sent to 29,000 subscribers of Motor Age, a sister publication
of aftermarket Business. Although motor oil was not one of the
items on the survey, market data from other sources can give
us a fairly clear picture of attitudes we'd find had the questions
been asked. Even without data, the results of this survey easily
lead to some interesting conclusions about the motor oil aftermarket.
Nearly 3,000 installers participated
in the survey which analyzed attitudes and behavior regarding
the installation of ball joints, batteries, belts & hoses,
clutches, sensors, gaskets, spark plugs, filters and more. The
website asked 42 questions about each automotive product segment.
The magazine then presented the results in easy to grasp pie
and bar charts.
Just a few examples of the questions
asked include: Where do you purchase your ball joints? How many
ball joint suppliers do you have? Where do you go for ball joint
installation training? Why did you buy that particular ball
joint?
Examples of possible answers to
this last question include: Brand Name, Warranty, Recommendation,
Availability, Incentive, Customer Request, Quality, Price, and
Delivery.
THE QUALITY EQUATION
What specifically intrigued me about this survey, and prompted
the writing of this article, was the pie chart on the middle
of each page beneath a very significant question. When you install
ball joints, what percentage are premium, mid-level or economy?
When comparing the various answers to this question, it did
not take long to notice a pattern. Let's see if you can see
it.
Ball Joints
Premium: 82%
Mid-Level: 14%
Economy: 4%
Batteries
Premium: 62%
Mid-Level: 27%
Economy: 11%
Belts & Hoses
Premium: 82%
Mid-Level: 13%
Economy: 5%
Brakes
Premium: 73%
Mid-Level: 21%
Economy: 6%
Clutches
Premium: 87%
Mid-Level: 11%
Economy: 2%
Exhaust
Premium: 55%
Mid-Level: 27%
Economy: 18%
Filters
Premium: 57%
Mid-Level: 29%
Economy: 14%
Fuel Pumps
Premium: 84%
Mid-Level: 13%
Economy: 3%
Gaskets
Premium: 85%
Mid-Level: 12%
Economy: 3%
Hub Systems
Premium: 80%
Mid-Level: 15%
Economy: 5%
Oxygen Sensors
Premium: 85%
Mid-Level: 12%
Economy: 3%
Shocks & Struts
Premium: 73%
Mid-Level: 21%
Economy: 6%
Spark Plugs
Premium: 64%
Mid-Level: 8%
Economy: 28%
In more than half of all categories,
more than 80% installed premium parts or components. In every
single category more than half of all respondents installed
premium products. When it came to a preference of quality over
economy, in these categories the installers favored quality
every time.
One category I did not include
above had to do with diagnostic equipment. When selecting diagnostic
tools nine out of ten installers themselves chose premium equipment.
This kind of ratio clearly indicates the recognition that there
is a difference in performance between premium and economy class
tools.
By economy we mean, of course,
that the price is given precedence over performance. The survey
writers were kind and avoided using the word "cheap"
which has a derogatory tone.
WHAT ABOUT MOTOR OIL?
I looked in vain for a "motor oil" category in this
survey. There may be a couple of reasons such a category was
missing. Even without asking we know that in this particular
category we'd see significantly reversed ratios. The NOLN survey
from earlier this year reveals a completely reversed attitude.
Instead of installing premium synthetic motor oils it is a nearly
universal reality that quick lubes are primarily installing
conventional petroleum oils. Why is this? Especially in light
of the fact that in every other category the majority of installer
prefer premium products?
Even the lowly spark plug gets
a better showing here. That is, there is a perception that premium
makes a difference. Otherwise wouldn't the economy plugs be
installed?
And that is exactly the problem
with our motor oil market. By pushing the cheaper product category
in motor oil, we are tacitly claiming that it does not matter
what people choose or use. How did this happen? Can we change
this perception? And more importantly, do we want to change
this perception?
As an aside here, I find it somewhat
disappointing that even though a majority of installers (57%)
selected premium filters, the filter category had one of the
lowest showings compared to other categories. Engine cleanliness
begins with quality filtration. Installing cheap filters is
a signal that either we do not really care about the long term
performance of our customers' vehicles or that we don't understand
the importance of filtration.
In the internal combustion engine
motor oil is just one component of an overall system that also
includes air and oil filters. Motorists invest premium dollars
in their cars, SUVs and light trucks. Premium products are the
natural product to recommend for these customers who are accustomed
to better and best in other areas, from hotels to dining out.
When I was young I routinely visited
nursing homes as a volunteer. At one of these homes a woman
I met there was fond of repeating this maxim: "Good, better,
best, never let it rest till your good gets better and your
better gets best." Sounds like a variation on the survey
question above, doesn't it? Economy, Mid-Level, Premium
.
Good, better, best.
If we all adhered to this principle,
we'd be continually educating our customers about the benefits
of synthetic lubricants and the role premium oil and filtration
products serve in providing optimal engine performance and longevity.
It makes a difference.
Ed Newman is Marketing &
Advertising Manager for AMSOIL INC.