Eskimos and
Other Cold Hard Facts
by Ed Newman
AMSOIL Marketing and Advertising Manager
This article appeared
in the December 2000 Issue of National Oil &
Lube News
In 1999 the map of
Canada changed for the first time in 50 years.
A new territory was carved out of the Northwest
Territories and returned to the Inuit people,
formerly called Eskimos. Inuit means "The
People" and the name of their new country
is called Nunavet, which means "Our Land."
The vast arctic region they inhabit is larger
than the State of Texas, even though their population
of 27,000 could comfortably occupy the World Trade
Center in New York (except for the lack of caribou.)
With its sub-zero winter temperatures few of us
are surprised to discover there is no population
explosion in Nunavet.
In case you didn't
know, Eskimos are racially distinct from the Native
American Indians that inhabit the more hospitable
climates of the North American Continent. In Eastern
Siberia, Alaska, Labrador and Greenland they're
still called Eskimos, which in Algonquin meant
"Eaters of Raw Meat."
While growing up
it seldom entered my mind to think of Eskimos
in terms of their diet. Like most people, I always
made the association of Eskimo with cold, inhospitable
environments, and igloos. As it turns out, Eskimos
live in all sorts of houses, including tents made
of skins and underground sod homes, though most
live in ordinary houses like ours. Certainly the
Arctic environment places demands on these people
to which most of us are unaccustomed, though it
also helps reduce panhandling and street people.
One of my favorite
short stories from high school days was Jack London's
To Build A Fire. The story takes place in Alaska's
Yukon region. It is a life and death struggle
between a man and the elements, with everything
hinging on his ability to build a fire. At the
beginning of the story the man spits and he realizes,
by the crackling sound of the spittle turning
to ice in mid-air, that it is more than fifty
below, colder than he realized.
Three decades after
I first read this story I was clearing my driveway
one December night in Duluth, Minnesota. There
had been a fair dump of snow followed by a blistering
cold Alberta Clipper. I knew it was cold, but
discovered how severe the wind chill was when
I spit and it became a marble before hitting the
crust of snow and rolling away.
I knew right then
it was cold. Fortunately that kind of weather
is not the norm, even in Minnesota. Now for really
cold conditions, think about what it's like to
live in the arctic. The average December temperature
at Gate of the Arctic National Park is twenty
below during the day and forty below at night.
Add wind chill temps and you've got weather!
Certainly the perception
of what is "too cold" is relative. When
Max Henton, Senior Chaplain and Founder of Motor
Racing Outreach, spoke here in Duluth recently
he told us that Charlotte was too far north for
his taste, but his ministry to Nascar drivers
demanded that he endure the hardship. I remember
flying to Charlotte on business at apple blossom
time, and Lake Superior here was still ice. Charlotte
hardly seemed "too cold" in my opinion.
There are some measures
that are not a matter of perception or taste or
preference. That's what modern science is all
about, isn't it? Ever measuring and quantifying,
scientists create tests to help benchmark product
characteristics. When it comes to motor oil and
winter time performance, one critical measure
is the pour point.
Pour point has been
defined as the lowest temperature at which a motor
oil will continue to flow under prescribed conditions.
ASTM D 97 spells out the standardized procedure
for determining an oil's pour point. Basically,
after heating it to 45 degrees C the sample is
slowly cooled and tilted sideways every time the
temp drops three degrees Celsius (five degrees
F). When the oil stops flowing it has reached
the pour point. Another important test of
an oils cold temp performance is the Cold Crank
Simulator. It does what its name suggests.
Synthetic motor oils
have a significantly lower pour points and better
cold cranking capabilities than petroleum based
products. The cold weather performance of
synthetic motor oils and lubricants is probably
the most recognizable feature of these high tech
lubes. Long after petroleum oils have solidified,
premium synthetics continue to flow. Some
synthetics on the market have a pour point of
sixty and seventy below zero.
The problems with
solidified oil are numerous. First, when
its cold, its hard to start the car... and when
very cold, impossible. A second problem: petroleum
motor oils, diesel fuels and home heating fuels
usually contain small amounts of dissolved waxes
(long paraffinic molecular strings) which, if
they agglomerate, could plug filters and pumps. Synthetic
motor oils have uniform molecular structure and
do not act this way.
The problem goes
beyond this, however. Our definition of pour
point indicates when the oil has ceased to be
capable of flowing at all. Motor oils really
need to be heated well above the pour point to
achieve the desired pumping viscosity. Even
if the motor oil is not solidified it can be so
thick that it can hardly be pumped into the engine.
It sits in the pan while the friction from moving
parts heats the engine and conducts this heat
down into the pan. As you can imagine, this
lack of oil in the engine with fast moving parts
is not a good thing. It should come as no surprise
that cold weather start-ups are a leading cause
of engine wear.
TRANSMISSIONS
AND GEAR BOXES, TOO
If you are a cold
climate lube shop, your customers will notice
immediate improvement in the ease of shifting
when they switch to synthetic transmission fluids.
Not only do synthetics provide better high temperature
protection in the summer, they especially help
cold weather operations.
I recently watched
a video presentation of a demonstration, conducted
by the Auto Research Laboratory, comparing cold
temp performance between synthetic and petroleum
gear lubes. At the beginning of the test two gear
oils were cold soaked and stabilized at minus
fifteen degrees F.
The petroleum based
gear oil had become a solid in the differential. The
gear cut a channel in the gear oil. After
five minutes there was no change in the solidified
oil. Seventeen minutes into the test the
gear oil finally began to flow into the top ring
gear and after eighteen minutes finally flowed
to the lube sensor at the front of the test apparatus.
The synthetic gear
oil began to flow immediately. In forty-five
seconds there was top channel flow. It took
less than two minutes to trigger the same lube
sensor. The difference was dramatic.
CLOSING THOUGHTS
Very few of us live
inside the arctic circle, but many of us are well
acquainted with freezing weather. This kind
of weather is ideal for skiing, skating, ice racing,
curling, and snowmobiling. It is not ideal
weather for cars, light trucks, diesels. Synthetic
motor oils, gear lubes and tranny fluids will
protect better and help your customers vehicles
last longer. Moving parts need lubrication
at start-up -- not one, two or five minutes later. Synthetics
provide this kind of cold weather protection,
even if you are an Eskimo.